Intelligence & Automation


This page is about topics related to intelligence,  human or nonhuman (animal, plant, computer, machine, or whatever).

Some of my publications on the topic:

Sterrett, Susan G. (2000) “Turing´s Two Tests for Intelligence” Minds and Machines, Vol. 10, pp. 541-559. Reprinted in The Turing Test: The Elusive Standard of Artificial Intelligence. Edited by James H. Moor. Kluwer Academic, 2003.

Abstract: On a literal reading of `Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, Alan Turing presented not one, but two, practical tests to replace the question `Can machines think?’ He presented them as equivalent. I show here that the first test described in that much-discussed paper is in fact not equivalent to the second one, which has since become known as `the Turing Test’. The two tests can yield different results; it is the first, neglected test that provides the more appropriate indication of intelligence. This is because the features of intelligence upon which it relies are resourcefulness and a critical attitude to one’s habitual responses; thus the test’s applicablity is not restricted to any particular species, nor does it presume any particular capacities. This is more appropriate because the question under consideration is what would count as machine intelligence. The first test realizes a possibility that philosophers have overlooked: a test that uses a human’s linguistic performance in setting an empirical test of intelligence, but does not make behavioral similarity to that performance the criterion of intelligence. Consequently, the first test is immune to many of the philosophical criticisms on the basis of which the (so-called) `Turing Test’ has been dismissed.

Link: (

Sterrett, S. G. (2002)   “Nested Algorithms and ´The Original Imitation Game Test´: A Reply to James Moor” Minds and Machines, Vol. 12, pp. 131-136.

Sterrett, S. G. (2002) “Too Many Instincts: Contrasting Philosophical Views on Intelligence in Humans and Non-Humans”, JETAI (Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence), Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 39 – 60. Reprinted in Thinking About Android Epistemology, Edited by Ken Ford, Clark Glymour and Patrick Hayes, MIT Press (March 2006).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s